In the table below is a comparison of camera types with their image sensor sizes, weaknesses and strengths.

Camera Type	Typical Sensor Size	Common Sensor Technology	Strengths	Weaknesses	Vibe
Smartphone Camera	Very small (1/2.3", 1/1.7", 1")	CMOS	Always with you, computational magic, great for casual shooting	Tiny sensor = limited physics, digital trickery required	The overconfident tech wizard
Micro Four Thirds (M4/3)	M4/3 (17.3×13 mm)	CMOS	Compact bodies + lenses, huge ecosystem, great stabilization	Smaller sensor = more noise + less shallow depth of field	The efficient minimalist
Crop Sensor (APSC)‑C)	APSC (approx. 23×15 mm)‑C (	CMOS	Great balance of size, reach, and price	Not as good in low light as full frame	The middle child who’s doing fine
Full Frame	36×24 mm	CMOS	Excellent lowlight, dynamic range, shallow depth of field‑light, dynamic range, shallow depth of field	Expensive bodies + lenses, heavier	The gym bro of cameras
Medium Format	Larger than full frame (44×33 mm, 53×40 mm, etc.)	CMOS (modern), CCD (older)	Insane detail, huge dynamic range, ultimate image quality	Slow, pricey, not for action	The aristocrat who only shoots at sunrise
Mirrorless Camera	Depends on model: M4/3, APSC, Full Frame, Medium Format‑C, Full Frame, Medium Format	CMOS	Fast AF, compact, modern features, silent shooting	Battery life can be tragic	The trendy digital nomad
DSLR	APSC or Full Frame‑C or Full Frame	CMOS (modern)	Rugged, optical viewfinder, long battery life	Bulky, aging tech, mirrors are so 2005	The old-school tank

Lesson 04: Comparison of camera types and sensor sizes

pentaxianer.no